|Clinton conceding the election today|
For example, one thing Clinton could have done was run a campaign that showed a responsible caring for libraries and concern about the plundering sales of our public assets. Hillary Clinton could have criticized her landlord, Forest City Ratner, for being a gatekeeper involved in the cynical shrink-and-sink real estate deal selling the second biggest library in Brooklyn, the library standing right next to her national campaign headquarters which is actually, for development purposes, the same piece of real estate. The library is the downtown Brooklyn Heights Library, but given the intersection where it is located you can call it the “Tillary Clinton Library.”
Yes, criticizing her landlord would have been biting the hand feeding her, but it would have been seen as courageous and honest. It would also have freed Clinton up to attack Trump’s de facto campaign manager and political advisor, his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, for being a principal beneficiary involved in the cynical shrink-and-sink Donnell Library deal.
The Donnell Library, similarly sold for a minuscule fraction of its value to the public, was the model for the “Tillary Clinton Library” shrink-and-sink deal laying right at her doorstep.
Showing that she cared about libraries and fair play, Hillary Clinton could have called for that Donnell Library sale and the Heights Library sale to be investigated.
Yes, investigation might have caused some problems for her one-time campaign manager and fellow Democrat Bill de Blasio given his pay-to-play hand-off of the library to an inferior bidder. Yes, pointing out the lack of investigation into Donnell could have been awkward for inert fellow Democrats like NYS Attorney General Eric Schniederman or NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer. . . That’s part of the point!. . .
. . . Think how much more credible and independent Hillary would have proven herself to be. And with a chance to lambaste Trump’s son-in-law/advisor she would have made headlines distinguishing herself. The public cares about its libraries. It cares about its public assets. So long as Clinton was willing to criticize the shrink-and-sink sale her landlord was participating in, Trump could never have turned it around on her.
No, Hillary Clinton didn’t do this. That would have been a different campaign. Yes, it would have been a different campaign in all the ways that her campaign needed to be a different campaign overall.
It would have been a different campaign in all the ways that the campaigns of Democrats overall, and the representation they give us when elected, need to be a qualitatively different.
Maybe then, despite everything else they are up against, Democrats could start winning. A difference they might appreciate.
Here is our Tweet of these Woulda/Coulda sentiments:
HRC criticizes Ratner, her landlord, 4library sale - ditto, Kushner, Trump's campaign manager- &Result?