Why Is New York City Planning to Sell and Shrink Its Libraries?

Defend our libraries, don't defund them. . . . . fund 'em, don't plunder 'em

Mayor Bloomberg defunded New York libraries at a time of increasing public use, population growth and increased city wealth, shrinking our library system to create real estate deals for wealthy real estate developers at a time of cutbacks in education and escalating disparities in opportunity. It’s an unjust and shortsighted plan that will ultimately hurt New York City’s economy and competitiveness.

It should NOT be adopted by those we have now elected to pursue better policies.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Resolution of The Pacifica National Board Governance Committee Responding To Acts Recently Taken By Certain Actors Within The Pacifica National Foundation Environment

We have recently been letting you know that, much like what is happening with New York City Libraries, in a dismantling attack on WBAI, New York's only truly listener supported public radio station and the Pacifica network of terrestrial public radio station of which WBAI is a part, WBAI has recently been removed from the New York air waves by a small group acting secretly to shut it down.

See:
    •    How The Proposed Self-cannibalizing Sale of WBAI Radio (And Other Pacifica Network Stations?) To “Finance” Pacifica Operations Is Like The Self-cannibalizing Selling Off of New York City’s Important Libraries To “Finance” Libraries- There Is Absolutely No Future In It


    •   Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Responding To Shutdown of WBAI New York
Also for more overview and fairly regular updates on what is going on with the Pacifica Network as well as WBAI, which the costly shut down has now brought much focus to, we highly recommend the post you can find at Pacifica in Exile.  The perspective you will find there is informed and insightful.

There is also a petition up that you can now sign requesting that WBAI be put back on the air.

We further present the following resolution that was adopted by the Pacifica National Board Governance Committee on October 23, as providing more insight.
Resolution of The Pacifica National Board Governance Committee Responding To Acts Recently Taken By Certain Actors Within The Pacifica National Foundation Environment                                               
Whereas, a number of acts have been taken recently by individuals within the Pacifica Foundation environment including actions taken to shutdown one of Pacifica’s five terrestrial radio stations, WBAI, broadcasting in New York City to the New York metropolitan region, and also the filing of a lawsuit against the Pacifica Foundation as well as against the individuals who are directors of the Pacifica Foundation;

Whereas, the actions to shutdown WBAI were taken in secret and without consultation with those whom it would be expected would be required to be informed and from whom approvals would be required in accordance with the good and proper governance of Pacifica including how it is envisioned and provided for under the Pacifica Foundation bylaws, including that the actions were done without consultation and kept secret from the WBAI Local Station Board and from the Pacifica National Board;

Whereas, the filing of the lawsuit against the Pacifica Foundation as well as against the individuals who are directors of the Pacifica Foundation was undertaken with secrecy and without discussion or consultation with the Pacifica National Board Governance Committee which has as its purview and responsibility ensuring the proper governance of the Pacifica Foundation including that is to “regularly review the Foundation's bylaws and policies for governance of Board activities,” but the Bylaws lawsuit was kept secret from the Pacifica National Board Governance Committee and it was not consulted about it beforehand;

Whereas, it is an especial affront to this committee that members of this committee, with the resources and recourse of the committee available, participated in the filing of the bylaws lawsuit without such consultation;

Whereas, the Bylaws lawsuit, by its own express terms appears to be an effort to supplant, with costly litigation, the normal appropriate governance of the Pacifica Foundation; and

Whereas, the Pacifica National Board has recently voted taking a number of actions to reverse the shutdown of WBAI and take other corrective action with respect; now, therefore be it

RESOLVED, by the Pacifica National Board Governance Committee as follows:

Section 1.  We declare a general condemnation of the unauthorized and secretive actions described above that were recently taken by those certain actors responsible for them.

Section 2.  We second the actions of the Pacifica National board by calling for the restoration  of WBAI to the status in which it stood as of October 4, 2019.

Section 3.  We note for the record that the need to call for this restoration of WBAI and the taking of other corrective action with respect thereto is necessary because of the substantial breaches of good corporate governance that the actions of those shutting down WBAI reflected.

Section 4.  We note for the record that these substantial breaches of good governance, injurious to the Pacifica Foundation to, are also undermining of the trust that is essential to good governance within our Pacifica Foundation so important to our functioning at maximum effectiveness and on an even keel such that much work must now be done to restore that trust.

Section 5.  We call for an immediate withdrawal by the plaintiffs of the bylaws lawsuit and their efforts to supplant normal governance.
                       
Section 6.   This resolution shall take effect immediately and direct the chair of this committee to forward this resolution to the Pacifica National Board and make every effort to promulgate it widely for public view and to ensure it becomes widely known that the Committee denounces the shutdown of WBAI, the locking out of WBAI's staff, the taking over of its programming and the attempt to supplant the Pacifica Foundation’s appropriate internal governance with costly litigation. 

Friday, October 18, 2019

Yahoo (i.e. Verizon, Which also Owns AOL Plus Much More) Is Deleting All Content Ever Posted To Yahoo Groups– Once More We Say: The Internet Giveth, and The Internet Taketh Away

Here is another occasion on which to say it: The internet giveth, and the internet taketh away.

Say au revoir to all the content that was ever posted Yahoo Groups. Will that content cease to exist entirely?  Who knows? . . .   Maybe that content and all the data that somebody might have harvested from it will continue to exist in somebody’s archive somewhere; it just won’t be available to the those individuals who were induced to use this forum, “one of the world's largest collections of online discussion boards” (according to Wikipedia) lulled by the sense that the services there were supposedly free and so convenient.

Now it’s far from convenient if that’s where you trusted to have your data reside. The content people offered up to the Yahoo platform’s care taking will evanesce in a wholesale deletion on December 14th.  If you want to try to save all your own content yourself, Yahoo says there is a process you can follow to try to do so, but, according to Ars Technica “It can take up to 30 days for the request to finish processing and the download to become available.”

For more information, the deletions which are imminent have been written about here: Goodbye, Yahoo Groups — Yahoo is deleting all content ever posted to Yahoo GroupsYou have until December 14 to download files before they're permanently removed, by Jon Brodkin, October 17, 2019, Deleting Yahoo Groups will leave a permanent stain on Yahoo’s legacy- The once-popular community site is part of internet history. Now Verizon plans to bulldoze much of it, by Harry McCracken, October 17, 2019, Yahoo Groups Is Winding Down and All Content Will Be Permanently Removed, - Users won't be able to upload new content to the site after October 28 and have until December 14 to archive their content, Yahoo said in an announcement, by Jordan Pearson, October 16, 2019.

One of those articles, Fast Company’s, observes that:
deleting a couple of decades of existing material, Verizon is eradicating a meaningful chunk of the internet’s collective memory. The Yahoo Groups archive is an irreplaceable record of what people cared about in its heyday. If it survived, it would only grow more valuable with time.
The Vice article notes:
This isn't the first time that Yahoo has turned the switch off on an important, if niche, platform and left users in the lurch. In 2009, Yahoo shut down GeoCities, taking roughly 7 million personal websites with it. At the time, digital archivists raced to save what content they could.
"These guys found the way to destroy the most massive amount of history in the shortest amount of time with absolutely no recourse," archivist Jason Scott told Time soon after it was shut down.
The internet giveth, and the internet taketh away.  We’ve been saying that already in other contexts.  For instance, we just pointed out how the New York libraries were replacing DVDs with internet streaming of films from Kanopy (the internet giveth). .  But now the libraries are discontinuing the Kanopy film streaming service (the internet taketh away).  See:  Kanopy, The Internet Movie Streaming Service That Was Being Used By NYC Libraries To Help Make Up For Elimination Of DVDs Is Now Being Abandoned!- The internet giveth! And The internet taketh away!

Or consider this National Notice article by Citizens Defending Libraries co-founder Michael D. D. White: There are about fifteen different ways to get your news from Democracy Now; just one of them is safely not through the internet (the internet giveth) and safely immune to its shut down and censorship (internet taketh away).  That alternative to the DN pipes that all flow through the internet is WBAI terrestrial radio. . . .
National Notice: How To Listen To “Democracy Now”- A Mind Boggling List of Possibilities For A Program That Was Incubated By Terrestrial Radio In NYC: Plus, Part II, A Few Cautions About Internet “Generosity”
. . . But, right now, a minority rogue faction of individuals, including some that managed to get on the Pacifica radio network’s national board, executed an unauthorized, stealth-attack shut down of WBAI.  Who knows who encouraged and supplied resources to these renegades?  The Pacifica board, having voted to reverse their destruction, is still working to get WBAI back on the air.  The excuse for the WBAI shutdown?: The internet has bled financial resources from all of the five Pacifica terrestrial radio stations, so its time to engage in some disaster capitalism tactics to corporatize and privatize Pacifica Network assets (the internet taketh away).

The rogue faction shutting down WBAI seemed very intent on destruction and removed from the internet all of WBAI’s archives, an Orwellian move that overnight banished all of WBAI’s history as well as recent, topical shows from the public access (the internet taketh away).

Back to Yahoo: Did you know that when Verizon, which owns AOL, acquired Yahoo, Yahoo became an identical clone of AOL?  The internet taketh away.  Did you know that AOL and Yahoo then simultaneously imposed new rules severely limiting the number of people you could include in your email group lists?  The internet taketh away.  That meant that existing group email lists you may have been using to communicate, for instance, with active and involved members of Citizens Defending Libraries could no longer be used as before.  Did you know that this is at a time when sending out such emails with curated information has become an especially important tool to cut through the noise and manipulation of the internet? . .  The internet taketh away. 

In some respects, the ability to put up and share content via Yahoo Groups was viewed as an alternative to Facebook.  Another alternative to Facebook, Google+, was taken down and all its content disappeared with its takedown.  Everything that Yoko Ono had posted there disappeared.  The internet taketh away.  It was taken down at the same time that Facebook was launching a censorship campaign working with the NATO war group, the Atlantic Council.  By going down just at the same time as the Facebook censorship campaign was launched, no one needed to try to observe whether the Google+ “competing” site would run a parallel censorship operation to Facebook’s.

Friday, October 11, 2019

Important For WBAI Radio- Participate And Vote (By October 15th) In the 2019 Local Station Board Elections- Candidate Interviews, Electronic Ballots

During the last WBAI elections we posted information about the important of WBAI and how important it is to vote in the Local Station Board elections: WBAI Radio- An Important Voice- Keeping It Meaningful & Alternative (Library Defenders Running For Its Local Station Board).

Right now there is the added factor that it is important to vote in the WBAI elections to protect WBAI, which was just shut down by a renegade group.  See: Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Responding To Shutdown of WBAI New York.

The WBAI shutdown and elimination of web pages about the election have made it harder to vote, but voting, no matter who you vote for is the most important thing.  Voting, no matter what, is the most important thing. We need about 200 more people to vote to reach a quorum and that is critical.  You need to vote ASAP and at least by October 15th.

You have the right to vote if you have contributed $25 more more between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019.

You will need to vote electronically. Here is what you need to do. 

Your voting email should probably come in to you from . . vote@simplyvoting.com
. . . with the subject line:  2019 Pacifica Station Elections - WBAI Listener.

If you specially request a ballot the subject line may be: Your e-ballot is here.

If you are having trouble finding your election emails to vote, A helpful search of mails is for: wbailb.
 
You will be sent to a link to vote and supplied with information to enter there like:
Elector ID - wbailb119XX
Password - DTKRXX
After that you can use drop down menus to assign numbers to rank the candidates you want. You can vote for as many candidates as you like in the order of your preference.

Who should you vote for?  Candidates are running on three slates.  One slate is the Indy Slate on which Citizens Defending Libraries co-founders, Carolyn McIntyre and Michael D. D. White, ran and were elected in the last election.  There is also a brand new slate of candidates, the Red Wave candidates, with a lot of candidates who are from DSA.  The candidates from all three slates of candidate are unanimously opposed to the shut down of WBAI that has occurred.

If you want to listen to the candidates (or watch a video) of the candidates debating, and perhaps learn about various aspect of running a radio station like WBAI and the Pacifica Network, here are links- (the debates were moderated by CDL co-founder Michael D. D. White):

Audio:
First Atrium WBAI Local Station Board Election 2019 Candidates Debate

Second Atrium WBAI Local Station Board Election 2019 Candidates Debate
Third Atrium WBAI Local Station Board Election 2019 Candidates Debate
Video:
WBAI Local Station Board Candidates Questioned 9/15/2019
If you want advice on who to vote for, it can make a difference, the way that the ranked choice voting formulas work, if people vote similarly.

There is a recommended ranking of voting that was widely distributed that combines candidates from the Indy and Red Wave slates.  It is below:

   
The listener candidate names in ranked order above are:
1.    DeeDee Halleck
2.    James Sagurton
3.    Marilyn Vogt-Downey
4.    Jim Dingeman
5.    Maxine Harrison-Gallmon
6.    Jack De Palma
7.    Katherine O'Sullivan
8.    Ana Garcia
9.    Safia Albaiti
10.    Simone Norman
11.    Steve Finkelstein
12.    David Andersson
13.    Rosa Palmeri
14.    Jez Zerbe
15.    Michael Mordowanec   

Thursday, October 10, 2019

How The Proposed Self-cannibalizing Sale of WBAI Radio (And Other Pacifica Network Stations?) To “Finance” Pacifica Operations Is Like The Self-cannibalizing Selling Off of New York City’s Important Libraries To “Finance” Libraries- There Is Absolutely No Future In It

The following is part of a previous recent post: Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Responding To Shutdown of WBAI New York.  We republish this part here, because it stands alone as something that our library defending public will want to think about.

Our New York City library defenders defenders are aware of how the NYC libraries system is being slowly dismantled as core assets, major libraries are being sold off and shrunk, library by library: Donnell, the Second biggest Library in Brooklyn, the only NYC Science Library, the emptying of millions of books from the stacks from the 42nd Street Central Reference Library, the shrinkage and book elimination at the biggest circulating library Mid-Manhttan, etc.

Here are what we wrote:

There is a lot of what is going on with respect to this attempted takeover of WBAI that will feel familiar to New Yorkers who have paid close attention to the privatizing sell-off of libraries and the transformation of libraries and their traditions into less democratic reformulations that are less threatening to the consumer model based power structures of our society.

There is, for instance, the deceptive descriptions that a corporate press is far too ready to repeat.  For instance, without talking to anyone else, the New York Times unsekptically quoted John Vernile the Interim Executive Director who acted by stealth to close WBAI as he offered reassurance that WBAI was not going away, that "Pacifica was determined not to sell that prime piece of radio real estate," and that "Pacifica, he said, wants to `rebuild' WBAI at some point, although he did not offer a clear target date."  "Rebuild WBAI"?: That sounds like the assurance that NYC libraries were being sold to build new and better "libraries of the future" or "libraries of the 21st Century."   . .  But you "build" from the ground up, not the top down, which is what WBAI has been doing.  Also, this rhetoric is contrary to the known internal dialogues of the people associated with Mr. Vernile: Selling WBAI is exactly what they are talking about and advocating.

There is also the strategy of working secretly in advance attempting to take people by surprise, to make things a "done deal" or "fait acompli" by the time the curtain is raised on what's planned.

Going along with this with New York Libraries and with Pacifica's handling of WBAI is the funny bookkeeping that manufactures a "crisis" to justify proposals to finance in self-cannibalizing sales of core and valuable public properties.  Naomi Klein has written about the various tactics of "crisis capitalism" and this variation is one of them.

We New Yorkers also know that when the privatizers want a public asset disposed of, a favorite tactic of the privatizers is to use every ruse to have that asset become, along the way, as shabby, unattractive, and hopefully as alienating as possible.  That can be involve something as grotesque as not cleaning or fixing the bathrooms of libraries, and we have also seen in a remarkable pattern of unvarying repetition, that with every library that comes up as a next target for sale (except for the brand new SIBL, Science, Industry and Business Library), the air conditioning mysteriously breaks and becomes unfixable.  If NYU wants to build on what was dedicated as public park space it is supposed to maintain, that park space fills with trash, etc.  (It is too much to summarize right now, but part of the challenges WBAI has faced in recent years involve financial arrangements, that were not beneficial that the Pacfica national office as decision make saddled it with.) 

WBAI has been doing a remarkable job of relying on volunteers to successfully operate on a shoe string.  Pacifica does not, as advertised, have a debt crisis, but it does have a cash flow challenge engendered in part by what the internet seeming offers for free (but its not).  Cash flow challenges are frequently dealt with by investing to generate new revenue.  In any budget there are what is known as "expenditure driven revenues."  Arguably Pacifica has been quite stingy recently in allocating resources.  WBAI in the largest, perhaps most influential metropolitan media market does its 24/7 programming with just 7 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) employees.  The much smaller Pacifica station in Berkeley never reduced staff to cut costs when others did and has, an FTE staff that is several multiples of that number.

A WBAI listener who recently died very recently, just months ago, contributed over $700,000.  With the investment of a small fraction of that money, not much more than $40,000, WBAI could be activating use of the High Definition capabilities of its new far less expensive, but far better HD antenna.  In short order WBAI could be broadcasting three times as much content 24/7 over the three HD terrestrial radio channels made possible (mirrored by internet streams of those channels).  It probably wouldn't triple income for WBAI, but it would substantially increase it without comparable increases in expense, and it would hugely boost WBAI's media profile in NYC.  Pacifica directed and sequestered these funds elsewhere.   

In the world of the New York City library sell-offs, the background plans associated with the library sell-offs involve long lists of multiple libraries to be turned into real estate deals, but, in classic divide-and-conquer fashion, the public only hears about one or two of these libraries being for sale at a time.  In the case of Pacifica, if WBAI is marshaled to the fore to be the subject of a self-cannibalizing sale, there is nothing to prevent other Pacifica stations to be moved against in subsequent stealth attacks for future self-cannibalizing sales.

The New York City library sales involve the template of consolidating shrinkages; a central library with smaller, perhaps fewer satellite libraries and in total, there is less aggregate library space than before.  When WBAI was taken off the air, its website was replaced with a page unveiling a new brand, look or concept of Pacifica: "Pacifica Across America."


The Web Page that replaced WBAI when it was taken off the air and its web pages and archives removed from the internet
What is "Pacifica Across America"?  How would "Pacifica Across America" come into existence and manifest itself?  Through the internet?  Would there be a centralized station operating that supplied the content?

One other thing that New York City library defenders are very familiar with when it comes to the book-eliminating reformulations libraries is the way that the changes being made are pushing those seeking information toward the digital and into the internet, which is far less private and far more subject to control and outside influence.

In resisting the court's Temporary Restraining Order ordering that WBAI be restored to the air, Counsel representing Mr. Vernile along with whoever acted with him to take the station off the air were eager to argue that decision of the issue should be removed to federal court and determined as an FCC (Federal Communications Commission).  The Chair of the FCC is Ajit Pai, a corporate media conglomerate lobbyist who is using his chair position at the FCC to eliminate net neutrality, which then allows for the content control privatizing initiatives of the corporate conglomerates to prevail much more easily.  .  .  .  

. . .  Additionally, it has been reported that“leaked documents show the White House is planning an executive order that would put Ajit Pai in charge of policing free speech online and allow government censorship of the Internet.”

That would go a long way to ensure that the content of any centrally based Pacifica Across America internet operation would be tame and nonthreatening to those in power.

When outside interests want to move in to take over and privatize, they don't always think in terms of acquiring the public assets in question: Taking control of the board that owns the public assets equates to the same thing.  In New York, one of the first two libraries for sale "as one of the most valuable" was the Pacific Branch, Carnegie designed and donated libraries in Brooklyn immediately next to Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards mega-monopoly project (both of those targeted libraries were next to Fores City Ratner property).  Real estate interests had targeted the Pacific Branch library for direct acquisition in the mid-1970s.  Back then, when the community fought to fend off the attack, the Brooklyn Public Library's public spirited board fought with the community to defeat the sell off.  When plans again surfaced in early 2013 to sell the Pacific Library, the BPL's board had been populated by real estate interests and the BPL was took the side of the real estate community in arguing for and promoting the sell off of the Branch.

If the Pacifica network radio stations are subject to consolidating privatizing sell offs and replaced something more central that swings further toward the corporate mainstream in the flavor of its politics, its is not just the terrestrial stations and their current local voices that would be lost.  The Pacifica archives, a vast amount of content representing a tremendously important record of an alternative view of history, would also be under control of of that entity.  That content, to which WBAI, with its sister stations, has been a significant contributor is a money maker for Pacifica.  New York City library defenders are familiar with the consolidating elimination of access to books that is means information availability is ever more subject to the decisions of a corporately minded group in control.

If it seems that, with a takeover of the Pacifica's board, Pacifica could become the enemy of its own public assets, it should be remembered that intent and potential of setting up Pacifica as a network was the opposite.  The intent, and the way it has worked in the past was that the network of Pacifica stations would have the extra strength of being cross-supporting.  So, for instance, as one small example, the New York Times reported in 1972 that when "Houston was blown off the air twice during its first months of broadcasting when its transmitter was bombed, allegedly by a right wing group. Then WBAI held several successful fund raising marathons for the crippled station, and Manhattan listeners pledged some $5,000 for the Houston affiliate."

In fact, over the years, WBAI has done much to support and keep the other Pacifica stations afloat and solvent.

Cross-supporting, the stations can be an insurance policy for each other to ensure that they are all kept alive.  That interrelationship works in another beneficial way too: Each station with its own independent voice is an insurance policy for free speech.  Lest something outrageous go unremarked upon at one station, other stations can point that out. 

* * * 

It is noted in the resolution that one of the first and most important things WBAI listener members can do right is to make vote in the interfered with ongoing Local Station Board election.  This is important especially to help ensure that a quorum is reached in that election (only about 200 more listener votes are needed for that purpose); it's not just important who you vote for.  Voting, no matter what, is the most important thing.  We will post more about the election.

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Responding To Shutdown of WBAI New York

New Yorkers are just becoming aware that WBAI listener-supported public radio was seized and shut down on Monday of this week.  It was seized and shut down in an improper and probably highly illegal stealth attack, information about which is provided here, but is not widely available to New Yorkers yet.  As of now WBAI has obtained a court order that the station be returned to its proper management and its normal broadcasting restored.

 New Yorkers need better means of getting information and being informed.  WBAI was one of the few outlets that provided that information.  WBAI is New York's only listener-supported public radio station.  (WNYC, which refers to itself as listener supported, is 70% corporately captured, as reflected by its increasingly corporate press release points of view and tendency to promote instigation and perpetuation of the Unites States' perpetual wars. .    . and probably also by the $1 million annual income of WNYC's recent president, Laura Walker.)

We have noted (see our Project Censored interview) the parallels between why it's important to preserve traditional libraries and why terrestrial radio is similarly important, and how the censoring forces aligning to dismantle traditional libraries have are similarly interested in wanting to sabotage and end listener supported terrestrial radio stations like WBAI.  We have noted that "the fight to protect WBAI as an information commons obviously involves a significant overlap with the fight to defend the libraries." In fact (disclosure), this is why two of the Citizens Defending Libraries co-founders went on WBAI's Local Station board, to protect the station and ensure its success.  

Here,  explaining much of what has happened respecting the recent seizure if the WBAI station by hostile interests, is the resolution that was adopted unanimously on Wednesday night, October 9th, by the WBAI's Local Station Board that is demanding the restoration of this New York radios station to properly serve the public.  (And here is a link to video of the WBAI local station board meeting where the resolution was adopted provided by Joe Friendly.


Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Responding To Shutdown of WBAI New York
Whereas, Article Seven, Local Station Boards, Section 3: Specific Powers and Duties, Subparagraph E. of the Bylaws (“Bylaws”), assigns various responsibilities respecting local station management to the WBAI Local Station Board (“WBAILSB” or “LSB”) as the Local Station Board for WBAI New York radio, including, in part:
    1.    “To screen and select a pool of candidates for the position of General Manager” and that the “LSB may initiate the process to fire a station General Manager.”

    2.    “To screen and select a pool of candidates for the position of station Program Director, from which pool of approved candidates the station's General Manager shall hire the station's Program Director.”

    3.    To evaluate “the station's Program Director.”

    4.    “To work with station management to ensure that station programming fulfills the purposes of the Foundation and is responsive to the diverse needs of the listeners (demographic) and communities (geographic) served by the station, and that station policies and procedures for making programming decisions and for program evaluation are working in a fair, collaborative and respectful manner to provide quality programming,” and

    5.    “To ensure that the station works diligently towards the goal of diversity in staffing at all levels and maintenance of a discrimination-free atmosphere in the workplace.”
Whereas, the WBAILSB has been working diligently in all respects to fulfill its responsibilities and yet WBAI’s broadcasting has apparently been shut down nevertheless without proper procedure or involvement of the WABILSB;

Whereas, WBAI was given in trust to Pacifica to maintain the vision of WBAI founder Louis Schweitzer to broadcast diverse and contrary views to the New York community; and

Whereas, a new Interim Executive Director for the Pacifica Foundation, Jon Vernile, appeared at WBAI with several other individuals, who are supposed to be currently serving as Directors of the Pacifica Foundation National Board (“PNB”) together with the other individuals taking direction from Mr. Vernile and/or these the two aforementioned Directors of the PNB (the “IED Crew”) and seized control of WBAI’s premises in order to shut down WBAI’s normal authorized broadcasting and replace it with other content of their own choosing; now, therefore be it

RESOLVED, by the LSB as follows:

Section 1.  We declare for the record that the IED Crew have shut down WBAI without notifying the LSB or any of its officers of these actions or providing any explanation thereto, and this is despite the fact that LSB Chair previously reached out to the IED seeking to open communications with the IED and offering to inform the IED about station and LSB operations and management, to which invitation the IED never responded, and despite the fact that the LSB’s Management Evaluation Committee similarly contacted the IED and similarly offered to inform him of its work underway, to which invitation the IED also did not respond.

Section 2.  We declare for the record that WBAI’s broadcast signal has since been used to broadcast programming that we hereby find is not “responsive to the diverse needs of the listeners (demographic) and communities (geographic) served by the station,” that such programing is not properly reflective of “station policies and procedures” and is not being produced by “working in a fair, collaborative and respectful manner” and is not providing “quality programming”; in fact, we find WBAI’s content has been politically neutered.

Section 3.  We declare for the record that the programming broadcast over WBAI by those seizing the WBAI station is harmful to WBAI and its brand, and to the community, and is driving away WBAI listeners.

Section 4.  Those seizing the WBAI station to shut it down have violated the Bylaws by not continuing to broadcast notice of the October 9, 2019 LSB meeting as required by the Bylaws.

Section 5.  We declare for the record that the WBAILSB made no decision to recommend the firing of WBAI’s General Manager, Berthold Reimers, nor of Interim Program Manager Linda Perry, nor has it voted in any way to express dissatisfaction with their work that could justify any current action that would hurt WBAI and Pacifica by removing them from their positions, especially in the arrogant, destructive, and illegal manner that the IED Crew acted.

Section 6.  We hereby direct that whatever acting General Manager the IED has put in place in charge of WBAI be removed and that whatever acting Program Director put in charge by the IED Crew (this is specifically not a reference to Linda Perry) also be removed, because, for at least three full business days, they have not identified themselves to the LSB or taken any steps to establish the relationship and coordination with the LSB required under the Bylaws, nor were whatever people who may hold such positions put in place by the IED Crew with proper procedures or involvement of the WBAILSB, and we further declare for the record that we did not endorse, or in any way concur in any actions of the IED Crew putting any such individuals in place, which we consider to be illegitimate and in contravention of the legal processes stipulated in the Bylaws.

Section 7.  The apparently ultra vires, unauthorized actions of the IED Crew that were launched with intentional secrecy are quite obviously intentionally harmful to WBAI and very significantly to Pacifica as a whole, including financially, and, accordingly, the LSB is committed to investigating for further appropriate action the likely personal liability of all members of the IED Crew, as well as any PNB member or other person assisting them in any way in such actions taken by them prior to authorization of the PNB.

Section 8.  Although we read in the New York Times that “Pacifica leaders said that the decision to shut down the station had been in the works for months, and that it was an essential step to save the larger foundation from ruin,” we do not know who the people are who are identifying themselves as these “Pacifica leaders,” and the LSB was never advised of, or consulted with about “the decision to shut down the station” that assertedly, “had been in the works for months,” and, as such, we think it is clear there could not have been any emergency reason for the formulation of secret plans to shut down the station without PNB or LSB knowledge, approval or consultation pursuant to referred to “months” of secrete planning.

Section 9.  The LSB finds for the record that unnoticed shutdown of WBAI was apparently intended to inflict extra harm on WBAI and Pacifica as a network by doing it in the middle of on ongoing, successful fund drive by WBAI and in the middle of an ongoing LSB election, thus impeding the right of WBAI voters to a free and fair election, including particularly, but not limited to impeding the ability of WBAI members to vote by taking down WBAI’s web pages and web links about the election.

Section 10. The WBAILSB finds it utterly reprehensible and believes it criminal that the IED Crew involved in this insubordinate insurrection arbitrarily shut down WBAI’s web pages and web links about the election, and redirected WBAI listener-donated funds to KPFA in California without first informing the PNB Directors and gaining the approval of WBAI's management and/or governing body and that the IED Crew arbitrarily and illegally occupied the station’s premises, evicted and locked out street producers, took equipment and station funds, solicited funds on WBAI’s airwaves for other station, and took intellectual property.

Section 11.  We find that in multiple ways the actions of the IED have been pretextual, associated with the dissemination of false information, and also appear to be discriminatory in intent and in result.

Section 12.  We urge all WBAI members to make every effort they can to vote in the Local Station Board elections, irrespective of the impediments thrown up by the actions of the IED Crew, while also recognizing that it is now probably necessary for Pacifica to attempt corrections for the defects the IED Crew have introduced into the election process. 

Section 13.  The LSB hereby supports and encourages all funding efforts to ensure that WBAI continues as a station broadcasting in New York appropriately reflecting the needs of our local communities.
                  
Section 14.  The LSB is particularly affronted and concerned that the months of planning this seizure by the IED Crew has entailed the deliberate elimination of WBAI’s archives, which, no longer available, means WBAI history is being erased in a very Orwellian fashion at exactly the time when the public seeing WBAI in the news should be able to explore and discover the content of the station that the IED Crew is now making the subject of controversy.

Section 15. The WBAILSB calls on any counsel representing Pacifica not to provide legal representation and counsel for any of the IED Crew in connection with their insubordination, insurrection, and ultra vires acts, as to do so would be, and must be handled as, an unwaiveable conflict of interest.

Section 16. The WBAILSB calls upon the PNB not to indemnify any of the IED Crew in connection with their insubordination, insurrection, and ultra vires acts; and instead, we ask the PNB to consider how it can recover for the losses sustained by WBAI and the rest of Pacifica by personally pursuing the individuals of the IED Crew who engaged in such acts.

Section 17. The WBAILSB urges the Directors of the PNB who have not invalidated their status as Directors by participating as a member of the IED Crew or by acting to support their actions, to remove from the Board and from any position in Pacifica all who participated in this attempted coup.

Section 18. The WBAILSB expresses, on behalf of the station, our gratitude to the Mayor of New York City and to the New York State Attorney General, for their expressions of friendship and support for WBAI, and urge them to assist WBAI in getting back on its feet.

Section 19. The WBAILSB finds that, as seized by the IDE Crew, the purpose of serving the New York community by broadcasting diverse and contrary views, for which WBAI founder Louis Schweitzer entrusted Pacifica with his gift is not being met or even minimally respected.
           
Section 20.  This resolution shall take effect immediately and direct the LSB chair to forward this resolution to the PNB and make every effort to promulgate it widely for public view and to ensure it becomes widely known that the LSB denounces this locking out of WBAI's staff and the taking over of its programming.
It is noted in the resolution that one of the first and most important things WBAI listener members can do right is to make vote in the interfered with ongoing Local Station Board election.  This is important especially to help ensure that a quorum is reached in that election (only about 200 more listener votes are needed for that purpose); it's not just important who you vote for.  Voting, no matter what, is the most important thing.  We will post more about the election.

There is a lot of what is going on with respect to this attempted takeover of WBAI that will feel familiar to New Yorkers who have paid close attention to the privatizing sell-off of libraries and the transformation of libraries and their traditions into less democratic reformulations that are less threatening to the consumer model based power structures of our society.

There is, for instance, the deceptive descriptions that a corporate press is far too ready to repeat.  For instance, without talking to anyone else, the New York Times unsekptically quoted John Vernile the Interim Executive Director who acted by stealth to close WBAI as he offered reassurance that WBAI was not going away, that "Pacifica was determined not to sell that prime piece of radio real estate," and that "Pacifica, he said, wants to `rebuild' WBAI at some point, although he did not offer a clear target date."  "Rebuild WBAI"?: That sounds like the assurance that NYC libraries were being sold to build new and better "libraries of the future" or "libraries of the 21st Century."   . .  But you "build" from the ground up, not the top down, which is what WBAI has been doing.  Also, this rhetoric is contrary to the known internal dialogues of the people associated with Mr. Vernile: Selling WBAI is exactly what they are talking about and advocating.

There is also the strategy of working secretly in advance attempting to take people by surprise, to make things a "done deal" or "fait acompli" by the time the curtain is raised on what's planned.

Going along with this with New York Libraries and with Pacifica's handling of WBAI is the funny bookkeeping that manufactures a "crisis" to justify proposals to finance in self-cannibalizing sales of core and valuable public properties.  Naomi Klein has written about the various tactics of "crisis capitalism" and this variation is one of them.

We New Yorkers also know that when the privatizers want a public asset disposed of, a favorite tactic of the privatizers is to use every ruse to have that asset become, along the way, as shabby, unattractive, and hopefully as alienating as possible.  That can be involve something as grotesque as not cleaning or fixing the bathrooms of libraries, and we have also seen in a remarkable pattern of unvarying repetition, that with every library that comes up as a next target for sale (except for the brand new SIBL, Science, Industry and Business Library), the air conditioning mysteriously breaks and becomes unfixable.  If NYU wants to build on what was dedicated as public park space it is supposed to maintain, that park space fills with trash, etc.  (It is too much to summarize right now, but part of the challenges WBAI has faced in recent years involve financial arrangements, that were not beneficial that the Pacfica national office as decision make saddled it with.) 

WBAI has been doing a remarkable job of relying on volunteers to successfully operate on a shoe string.  Pacifica does not, as advertised, have a debt crisis, but it does have a cash flow challenge engendered in part by what the internet seeming offers for free (but its not).  Cash flow challenges are frequently dealt with by investing to generate new revenue.  In any budget there are what is known as "expenditure driven revenues."  Arguably Pacifica has been quite stingy recently in allocating resources.  WBAI in the largest, perhaps most influential metropolitan media market does its 24/7 programming with just 7 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) employees.  The much smaller Pacifica station in Berkeley never reduced staff to cut costs when others did and has, an FTE staff that is several multiples of that number.

A WBAI listener who recently died very recently, just months ago, contributed over $700,000.  With the investment of a small fraction of that money, not much more than $40,000, WBAI could be activating use of the High Definition capabilities of its new far less expensive, but far better HD antenna.  In short order WBAI could be broadcasting three times as much content 24/7 over the three HD terrestrial radio channels made possible (mirrored by internet streams of those channels).  It probably wouldn't triple income for WBAI, but it would substantially increase it without comparable increases in expense, and it would hugely boost WBAI's media profile in NYC.  Pacifica directed and sequestered these funds elsewhere.   

In the world of the New York City library sell-offs, the background plans associated with the library sell-offs involve long lists of multiple libraries to be turned into real estate deals, but, in classic divide-and-conquer fashion, the public only hears about one or two of these libraries being for sale at a time.  In the case of Pacifica, if WBAI is marshaled to the fore to be the subject of a self-cannibalizing sale, there is nothing to prevent other Pacifica stations to be moved against in subsequent stealth attacks for future self-cannibalizing sales.

The New York City library sales involve the template of consolidating shrinkages; a central library with smaller, perhaps fewer satellite libraries and in total, there is less aggregate library space than before.  When WBAI was taken off the air, its website was replaced with a page unveiling a new brand, look or concept of Pacifica: "Pacifica Across America."

The Web Page that replaced WBAI when it was taken off the air and its web pages and archives removed from the internet
What is "Pacifica Across America"?  How would "Pacifica Across America" come into existence and manifest itself?  Through the internet?  Would there be a centralized station operating that supplied the content?

One other thing that New York City library defenders are very familiar with when it comes to the book-eliminating reformulations libraries is the way that the changes being made are pushing those seeking information toward the digital and into the internet, which is far less private and far more subject to control and outside influence.

In resisting the court's Temporary Restraining Order ordering that WBAI be restored to the air, Counsel representing Mr. Vernile along with whoever acted with him to take the station off the air were eager to argue that decision of the issue should be removed to federal court and determined as an FCC (Federal Communications Commission).  The Chair of the FCC is Ajit Pai, a corporate media conglomerate lobbyist who is using his chair position at the FCC to eliminate net neutrality, which then allows for the content control privatizing initiatives of the corporate conglomerates to prevail much more easily.  .  .  .  

. . .  Additionally, it has been reported that“leaked documents show the White House is planning an executive order that would put Ajit Pai in charge of policing free speech online and allow government censorship of the Internet.”

That would go a long way to ensure that the content of any centrally based Pacifica Across America internet operation would be tame and nonthreatening to those in power.

When outside interests want to move in to take over and privatize, they don't always think in terms of acquiring the public assets in question: Taking control of the board that owns the public assets equates to the same thing.  In New York, one of the first two libraries for sale "as one of the most valuable" was the Pacific Branch, Carnegie designed and donated libraries in Brooklyn immediately next to Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards mega-monopoly project (both of those targeted libraries were next to Fores City Ratner property).  Real estate interests had targeted the Pacific Branch library for direct acquisition in the mid-1970s.  Back then, when the community fought to fend off the attack, the Brooklyn Public Library's public spirited board fought with the community to defeat the sell off.  When plans again surfaced in early 2013 to sell the Pacific Library, the BPL's board had been populated by real estate interests and the BPL was took the side of the real estate community in arguing for and promoting the sell off of the Branch.

If the Pacifica network radio stations are subject to consolidating privatizing sell offs and replaced something more central that swings further toward the corporate mainstream in the flavor of its politics, its is not just the terrestrial stations and their current local voices that would be lost.  The Pacifica archives, a vast amount of content representing a tremendously important record of an alternative view of history, would also be under control of of that entity.  That content, to which WBAI, with its sister stations, has been a significant contributor is a money maker for Pacifica.  New York City library defenders are familiar with the consolidating elimination of access to books that is means information availability is ever more subject to the decisions of a corporately minded group in control.

If it seems that, with a takeover of the Pacifica's board, Pacifica could become the enemy of its own public assets, it should be remembered that intent and potential of setting up Pacifica as a network was the opposite.  The intent, and the way it has worked in the past was that the network of Pacifica stations would have the extra strength of being cross-supporting.  So, for instance, as one small example, the New York Times reported in 1972 that when "Houston was blown off the air twice during its first months of broadcasting when its transmitter was bombed, allegedly by a right wing group. Then WBAI held several successful fund raising marathons for the crippled station, and Manhattan listeners pledged some $5,000 for the Houston affiliate."

In fact, over the years, WBAI has done much to support and keep the other Pacifica stations afloat and solvent.


Cross-supporting, the stations can be an insurance policy for each other to ensure that they are all kept alive.  That interrelationship works in another beneficial way too: Each station with its own independent voice is an insurance policy for free speech.  Lest something outrageous go unremarked upon at one station, other stations can point that out.

Thursday, October 3, 2019

The “Reimagined” Hunts Point Library Forgot About The Traditional Library Experience of Book Browsing: It Has No Access For Wheelchairs Or Mothers With Strollers!

The new library design was promoted for its excellence at multiple “Reimagining Libraries” events. it was promoted by those seeking to turn libraries into real estate deals.  And the press, continuing to fall into line behind the official narrative, dutifully gushed about the design when the library finally opened.  But the design of the library didn’t start by considering the basics, how those using the library would access and browse the books.

The three fiction sections of the library are tiered on three inaccessible levels above the lobby. . . No elevators go up to them.

A spokesperson for the Queens Public Library said that library staff was willing to fetch books “for customers” (library officials now insist on calling library patrons by the commercial term “customers”)  The article quotes Joe Bachner, from Jackson Heights in response as saying this misses the point:
“Browsing is part of the enjoyment of going to the library,” he said. He noted that the lack of access also precludes certain patrons from relaxing or reading in those areas, which are fitted out with chairs and charging stations, not to mention the dazzling waterfront views.
See this coverage form the Gothamist: The New $41 Million Hunters Point Library Has One Major Flaw, by Elizabeth Kim, October 3, 2019

There is another story about the construction of the library.  It seems almost as if it was intentional that there were construction problems so that the NYC Department fo Design and Construction could be excoriated in City Council hearings.  Those excoriations are so that it can be argued that library construction should be privatized and turned over to those selling off the libraries. . .  But those are the same people who promoted this “reimagined library” that carelessly neglects the basics of a traditional library.

Sunday, September 22, 2019

Defending The Libraries At the Brooklyn Book Festival: Don’t Let Eric Klinenberg Neuter The Narrative

Eric Klinenberg headed in to tell librarians how to
Our Library Defense team was out at this year Brooklyn Book Festival collecting many pages of new petition signatures.  It also where we spotted our favorite ringer, author Eric Klinenberg delivering a deceptive message, an address to New York City Librarians telling them how to defend NYC libraries and what is at stake in terms of their survival.

We were outside as people, including Mr. Klinenberg, entered handing out this flyer with critical information and our point of view:

The flyer read:
DEFEND OUR LIBRARIES! . . . YES, THE RIGHT WAY
    Don’t Let Eric Klinenberg Neuter The Narrative
  Eric Klinenberg was solicited to write about libraries (a nice `official’ story?) and the “defense” that libraries need, by the library-sale-promoting Revson Foundation. That’s the same Revson Foundation that has promoted the so-called “re-envisioning” of libraries, which has been accompanying a substantial dismantlement of NYC libraries with elimination and off-siting of books, and a  deprofessionalization of librarians.    

Mr. Klinenberg says that although he spent a year doing extensive research in New York about libraries to write his book he never heard of Citizens Defending Libraries, never heard of The Committee to Save The New York Public Library, or our actions to oppose and defeat the NYPL Central Library Plan, and apparently he never heard about selling libraries to turn them into real estate deals, the elimination of books or the commercialization of the libraries.  Nonetheless, he adopted a host of our major op-ed talking points retreading them as his own, but with key points about defending our NYC libraries oddly and conspicuously omitted.

The difference between Mr. Klinenberg’s narrative and ours?  We talk about:
•    Shrink-and-sink library sale deals like the sale of the Donnell Library and the sale of the second biggest library in Brooklyn, the downtown Heights Business, Career, Education and Federal Depository Library.
•    Sale and elimination of SIBL, NYC’s central science library (This still new library is being turned into a comic book museum).
•    The shrinkage and elimination of books at the 42nd Street Central Reference Library and the Mid-Manhattan library (renamed “SNFL”).
•    The hand off of library space as “underutilized” to the political “Spaceworks” real estate entity.
•    The huge expense to the public of such plunderings.
•    Commercialization of the libraries, including with privatizing “partnerships,” including the NYPL and Brooklyn central libraries, including shorter hours for users that facilitate society weddings–*
•    The pretextual underfunding of libraries to facilitate the above
•    Why pushing the library using public to less preferred digital books the internet for their information is problematic.
(*This week our community protests caused the NYPL to stop its “reputational laundering” grant of 42nd Street public library space to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (“MBS”), responsible for the Yemen War and reputedly also for the dismemberment killing of Jamal Khashoggi.  MBS was going to teach young people about “reputation management.”)

Sign our petition on the web: Citizens Defending Libraries 
Here is more about the Book Festival and press freedom
Look Who’s All On The Same Brooklyn Book Festival Panel This Week Discussing U.S. Press Freedom!: Jim Acosta, Suzanne Nossel, and Joy Reid– All of Whom Have Very Astute Critics As To Whether They Actually Support Press Freedom
Real library defenders were there to great Klinenberg