Library Defenders Are Running For The WBAI Local Station Board To Keep WBAI Independent, Accountable To The Listeners, A Free Speech Bulwark Against Censorship

 

Library Defenders, names you’ll probably recognize, are running for the WBAI local station board to keep the WBAI 99.5 FM radio station (“Radio for the 99.5%") independent, accountable to the listeners, a free speech bulwark against censorship.

We hope all WBAI listener members will vote for them and the rest of the Indy (Independent) slate that they are running on.

 Who To Vote For To Keep WBAI Independent, Accountable To The Listeners, A Free Speech Bulwark Against Censorship.

The WBAI Local Station Board election voting has begun.  You should have gotten your ballot.  Voting will continue until October 15th.   You must cast your ballot by 11:59 PM EST, October 15th, 2021, but you can make up your mind and vote now.  If you didn't get your ballot let us know.*

(* And remember that if you donated the qualifying amount-- $25 or more for each member voter-- your WBAI donating household is entitled to cast more than one vote and should.  If you're having any problems, see below about who to contact including us.)

Who to vote for?  We suggest you vote for everyone* on the Indy (independent) slate.    Vote for the Indy slate members to keep WBAI independent, accountable to the listeners, and a free speech bulwark against censorship (like the escalating censorship and sly manipulation the internet is increasingly subject).

(* It's tough to explain, but voting for every candidate on the Indy slate, because of ranked choice voting, helps every candidate on the slate.  So it actually helps me get elected personally if you vote for all the other Indy candidates as well.)

Here is who to vote for on the Indy slate.  This year we are not formally ranking our Indy candidates, but I certainly hope that you will place me high on your list.  You'll see some familiar faces here (including activist faces familiar from our fight against library sales and real estate takeovers), and you see some exciting new blood, some of it younger, bringing an infusion of energy and new ideas.

Here is our Indy listener candidate slate that you can vote for:

    •    Michael D. D. White
    •    Scottye Battle
    •    Katherine O’Sullivan
    •    Phil DePaolo
    •    M. Kay Williams

    •    Priscilla Cancar
    •    John Hoffman

    •    Jim Dingeman
    •    Matthew Reiss
    •    Bruce Greif

End of story if you want to vote now? Maybe, but here is more information to help you.

As background, also know that while the listeners will elect 9 listener Local Station Board members this election (with ranked choice voting you can vote for more candidates but only candidates you want) the WBAI staff will elect three staff Local Station Board members.   Here is our Indy staff candidate slate that staff can vote for:

    •    Shawn Rhodes
    •    R. Paul Martin
    •    Max Schmid

What about voting for others beside those on the Indy slate?  Maybe (one or two?).  There are two other slates of candidates running.--

. . .  We suggest that you do not vote for candidates on the JUC or "Justice and Unity" slate as they have an an agenda that is most different from ours in that several of their candidates have for a very long time been supporting a transfer or lease of WBAI (sometimes called a PSOA- Public Service Operating Agreement) that would end listener accountability and control- sometimes it is misleadingly referred to as some sort of "partnership").  In other words, it would end the democratic structure that protects WBAI from privatizing takeovers in very much the same way the two proposed bylaw referendums we had to fend off and defeat would have done.  Those bylaw referendums came from the same people who illegally and sneakily shut down WBAI for the month of October in 2019.

. .  There is another slate, the DSA, Democratic Socialists of America, slate that is running two listener candidates.  The DSA elected LSB members in the last election and they have often, but not always, voted with the Indys.  All of the DSA candidates oppose and sale, swap of signal or lease (PSOA) of WBAI, unlike the member of the JUC.  DSA members also have a good record of being cooperative and fair, where as some of the JUC have, we think, sometimes been negative in a way that's deleterious to the station's reputation, and unproductively disruptive.

Ranked choice voting is sufficiently mysterious in the way it works so we don't know for sure whether voting for the DSA candidates or other wild card candidates would push down Indy success in the election or would help them win over JUC candidates.  

Your call- you may want to vote for the two DSA listener candidates, but only after you have voted for all the INDY candidates first in your ranking.

Those two candidate are:

    •    Dylan Saba

    •    Nicodemus (Nick) Nicoludis

The additional wild card candidates who are not affiliated with any slate? If they are not on on our Indy slate, it's because they didn't join with us, even though we may have reached out to them to do so.

Want to know more about our Indy candidates, watch their videos, read their statements?  OK, but first we'll tell you some people endorsing our Indy slate

Our Indy Slate Is Endorsed BY:

   

•        Judy Gorman- The singer song-writer activist, mentored by Pete Seeger who wrote our Defending Libraries Song.
    •    Maxine Harrison-Gallmon- An Indy on the LSB intimately familiar with how the station works through her dedicated volunteer work there.
    •    Alicia Boyd- Activist who founded MTOPP to fight the aggressive real estate interests in Brooklyn, intent among other things, on over-shadowing the Brooklyn Botanical Garden with towers.
    •    Tracy Rosenberg- One of Pacifica’s best historians and analysts keeping facts straight.
    •    James Sagurton- Pacifica’s current Treasurer from the Indys’ who has done so much to put Pacifica’s financial house in order.
    •    Carolyn McIntyre- A Co-founder of Citizens Defending Libraries and Chair from the Indys of the Local Station Board for the last three years.
    •    Alex Steinberg- Current Pacifica National Board chair expert at tactically navigating Pacifica through crises.
    •    Grace Aaron- Former Indy chair of the Pacifica National Board who had much to do with obtaining the loans that allowed WBAI and Pacifica to extricate from the financial drain of the exorbitant Empire State Building antenna lease.
    •    Lucy Koteen- prominent member of Human Scale New York, fought Atlantic Yards, Fighting destruction of Fort Green Park and fighting various other city environmental and community protection battles.
    •    DeeDee Halleck- Famed Indy film and documentary maker and another Indy on the LSB elected last election.     

Indy Candidate Info, Statements and Videos

For a deeper dive, here is more about our Indy candidate listener slate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael D. D. White- Needs to be re-elected! Activist lawyer, dynamic and productive on the LSB, skilled in public finance, urban planning & social policy. A writer-activist defending free speech & cofounder of Citizens Defending Libraries who helped beat back the city’s powerful real estate establishment.

 

    •   Statement
    •   Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scottye Battle- Veteran learning specialist and professor of English, she spent many years living in Japan and is an empowerment advocate for students with special needs. Her effervescent personality will bring needed positive energy to the board.

 

 

   •   Statement
    •   Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Katherine O’Sullivan-  Performance artist devoted to public advocacy. She helped form Moving Forward Unidos to fight privatization of the commons in NY, fought the radical upzoning of Inwood that will displace a lower income population while destroying the Inwood Library. She is also a bookkeeper whose skills the board will welco

 

    •   Statement
    •   Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phil DePaolo-  Seasoned political advisor and organizer for local activist groups fighting real estate and industry exploitation. Co-author with Professor Tom Angotti of “Zoned Out! Race Displacement and City Planning.”

    •   Statement
    •   Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M. Kay Williams- Williams-An experienced Physician's Assistant with a Masters of Public Health from Columbia, she aided refugees in Thailand and health workers in Nicaragua. Former chair of the Free Speech Radio Alliance.

 

    •   Statement
    •   Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Priscilla Cancar- Product Manager at an EdTech company that supports the learning experiences and voices of youth. Creates activist videos and oversaw social media and website design for City Council candidate Victoria Cambranes. Born & raised in Brooklyn, Puerto Rican and Croatian – an ear for all the diverse voices of our city’s youth.

    •   Statement
    •   Video (done for Citizens Defending Libraries fight)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Hoffman- WWBAI listener for 50 years, grew up in Brooklyn. Skilled in finance, preparing and monitoring budgets, forecasting and deciphering balance sheets, he will help stabilize and solidify WBAI’s precarious cash flow.

    •   Statement
    •   Video

 

Jim Dingeman- Needs to be re-elected! WBAI and Pacifica historian, experienced print, radio and TV journalist and military analyst. Doing vital work to recover WBAI’s lost CPB grants worth more than $4 million. Also spearheading move to get WBAI its own HQ building. Focused and goal oriented, a dynamic organizer. Helped speed long delayed premiums to thousands of frustrated donors.

    •   Statement
    •   Video

 

 

Matthew Reiss- Award-winning investigative journalist (Village Voice, NY Times, The Nation, Mother Jones, Counterpunch). Has interviewed everyone from Noam Chomsky, Mort Sahl and Dick Gregory to Seymour Hersh, Woodward/Bernstein and Bernie Sanders. Also dodged bullets and bad guys as a war correspondent in Guatemala, North Korea, Kosovo and Yugoslavia. Currently professor of Journalism at Rutgers.

    •   Statement
    •   Video/Audio

 

 

Bruce Greif- A wizard at data tracking and project management in complex organizations, he will work hard to normalize the station’s often chaotic administrative issues.

    •   Statement
    •   Video

Faces of Our Endorsers

Endorsers of the Indy slate above, left to right: Judy Gorman, Maxine Harrison-Gallmon, Alicia Boyd, Tracy Rosenberg, James Sagurton, Carolyn McIntyre, Alex Steinberg, Grace Aaron, Lucy Koteen, DeeDee Halleck.

Here is another late entry endorser- Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan:

And here is another late entry endorser- Casper the Friendly Ghost- Why? because another slate of candidates running for office has decided to have dead people endorse their slate, so it seemed only fair to follow suit and figuring that Casper is friendly, we should have have him endorse us in the same not quite so meaningful way:

The candidates are having debates.  Visit the website: elections.pacifica.org for debates.  For the first debate that has already been held you can find audio in the WBAI Archive for Sunday, August 15, 2021 and Zoom Video is available here.  The first third of the debate has library defenders Michael D. D. White and Katherine Sullivan.  M. Kay William was in the second third.  Scottye Battle and John Hoffman are in the last third.

BALLOTS & VOTING

Ballots were sent on August 16th, 2 pm ET / 1 pm CT / 11 am PT.

For any ballot request you must file a ballot request form.

Emails are insufficient.

Ballot request form 2021

Please contact us Michael White or Carolyn McIntyre,cemac62@aol.com, if you are having problems voting or getting your ballot when you request if it has not already arrived.

Visit the website: elections.pacifica.org for candidate statements and debates.

Again- Please cast your ballot by 11:59 PM EST, (10:59 PM CST, 8:59 PM PST,) Oct 15th, 2021

MOREOVER, Please make sure you contact all your WBAI listener members and make sure they also vote.  Thank you.

Disclaimer: This is not an official communication of WBAI or Pacifica.

For even more information, background and views: Steve Brown sent out a mailer about the election and the candidates that you may have already received (yes we cribbed). 

 

Citizens Defending Libraries has also posted previous pages about how the fight to protect our libraries and the fight to keep WBAI strong are related fights, both opposing privatizing takeovers, both related to how we must fend off attempts by moneyed interest to own our information and control our narratives and thinking.  You can access those earlier posts by scrolling down from this link.  

Also, you will find the website for theCalifornia Pacifica station listeners saying what the Indy candidates ("The Good Governance Coalition") stand for.

As The Public Gets Distracted With Other Descriptions, Biden Is About To Pass The Worst Kind of Infrastructure Bill- One That Privatizes Our Public Assets

We are not even hearing about it, but something really awful is about to happen: It looks like we are about to pass the worst kind of “infrastructure bill,” one that will be privatizing public assets.  It’s being set up so nobody is supposed to notice.

If you really don’t pay attention to anything, maybe the only thing you’ll notice that they are describing the bill as a “Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal”– “Bipartisan” sounds sort cooperative and friendly, like something everybody should agree on as good.

If you think you are paying attention they might have successfully distracted you by highlighting other asserted flaws in the bill, flaws that may, or may not, be taken care of to some extent before the bill is passed; the flaw that the bill lacks measures to address climate change; flaws that it doesn’t meet social and racial justice standards by, for example, failing to spend on neglected public housing.

The New York Times coverage of the bill, including virtually no policy analysis, ruminated about its potential passage mostly as a political jockeying and horse race story, and referred to how the spending being planned was not addressing:

“human infrastructure”: education, child care, paid leave and tax credits to fight poverty, among other initiatives.

(See: Biden Kicks Off Sales Tour to Salvage Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal- An event in rural Wisconsin was meant to show liberals that the agreement was sufficiently ambitious — while assuring moderates that the president remained committed to the deal.  By Jim Tankersley, June 29, 2021.)

Democracy Now opened up its Tuesday, June 29, 2021 coverage as if the major part of the story would be how would be linked to how western states are battling record-breaking heat waves, (Portland hitting “116 degrees Fahrenheit Monday, making it one of the hottest places in the world”).  Starting into the story, we heard that:

Members of the Sunrise Movement called on Biden and congressional Democrats to pass an infrastructure bill that includes major investments in green energy, including a fully funded Civilian Climate Corps.

The Democracy Now story also pushed to the fore public housing that is being allowed to deteriorate.  (See: Rep. Jamaal Bowman: We Need Climate & Racial Justice Addressed in Broader Infrastructure Package, June 29, 2021.)

But then, as David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, was being interviewed as part of that Democracy Now story, he did an important pivot that had not been Teed up at the beginning of the segment and maybe wasn’t planned for.  He brought up that privatizing public assets was distressingly a “key piece” of the bill.

Here’s how it went in Dayen’s exchange with Democracy Now cohost Juan González:

DAVID DAYEN: . . .  But what’s the key piece of the bipartisan bill, to me, in addition to the lack of climate measures and, as you correctly point out, the fact that nature, from Seattle to Miami, where sea level rise may have been a large contributor to the collapse of the condo building, is just screaming for a change in priorities in America because of the climate crisis and a need to upgrade our infrastructure to reflect this new reality — but the other thing that’s in that bipartisan bill is privatization. So, it’s really the selling off of infrastructure to private companies, and really the substitution of public tax collection, where we pay for these common assets that we all use and share, to private tax collection, where you sell the infrastructure assets to a private company, whether for toll roads or privatized water systems, privatized parking meters, or what have you, and that private company gets to effectively tax the public. And inevitably, that tax goes up, because they have to build in their layer of profit. So, I think that’s something that progressives like Representative Bowman need to focus on, because it’s a very dangerous part of the bipartisan bill.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: But, David Dayen, are those concerns sufficient for many progressives to say, “No, let’s kill this thing altogether”? Because, clearly, the move to privatize public assets has been part of the neoliberal agenda now for about four decades.

DAVID DAYEN: It has been. And that’s why it’s incumbent to take a stand at this point. I mean, you have a representative on; you can ask him if that’s sufficient or not. But it is a serious issue. I mean, we have examples of this, as you say, Juan, all over the country — water systems that charge exorbitant rates, parking meters in places like Chicago that have gone up 800% in their rates over a number of years, and every time the street is shut down for a street fair, the private company gets to recoup lost revenue from that day. It’s not just the gouging of the people who use the infrastructure; it’s the loss of democratic control. So, a private company is in charge and says when the street will be shut down or not, and the private company is in charge of when a certain toll road is open or not. So, that’s, I think, at the core of the issue with privatization, which, as you correctly point out, was part of this neoliberal project. But we’re in a new era, and I would hope that there would be very strong pushback against it.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And what about that, Congressman Bowman, in terms of, in Chicago, for instance, a private parking meter company, whenever the city wants to shut down a street for a parade, it has to reimburse the private parking meter company for its lost revenues? . . .

It seems we are not supposed to be paying attention to these very important privatization provisions.  Read the New York Times coverage, scan it as hard as you can, you’ll find no mention of these important privatization provisions.  They are just not there. . .

. . . And oddly, the next day, Democracy Now did a follow-up on the infrastructure deal proposals interviewing Congressmember Nikema Williams of Georgia, and in that follow up totally neglected to have any mention or discussion about the privatization provisions.  Democracy Now host Amy Goodman set up the very limited discussion going right back to making it seem that the only flaw in the bill to focus on is its deficiency with respect to climate change provisions:

AMY GOODMAN: . . .It [the bill] does not include funding for major programs championed by progressives, including investments in green energy jobs and funds to combat the climate crisis, as we are experiencing the worst heat ever in this country, not to mention Canada, as well. Portland broke every record, one of the hottest places on the planet right now. That’s Portland, Oregon, just to name one place. In a moment, we’re going to talk about what happened in Florida with the catastrophic collapse and its connection, possibly, to the climate crisis. But what about this, the demand that the — linking the bipartisan infrastructure plan with the much larger one that Bernie Sanders and others are crafting?

In part, the horse race and political jockeying story being told (the Times story is such a prime exhibit in this regard) is another version of the corporate Democrats always winding up inexplicably incompetent to win anything they say they stand for when faced with the mysteriously always effective thwarting maneuvers from the corporate Republicans (who are nominally the corporate Democrats “opposition”).  It is yet one more example of Biden scaling back to seek far less than the very meager things he promised when he ran for office. . . forget about the public option, forget about minimum wage and now this infrastructure spending will be far less than what Biden talked about when he sought office.
                                            
Other than this lack coverage of the privatization aspects of the “bipartisan” infrastructure deal, the coverage has been about how inadequate the funds now being made available are versus how dire the need is to spend on our roads, bridges, water projects, replacing our lead water pipes, and other major projects, along with how great it would be to deploy reliable high-speed broadband internet in all our rural areas to reach “every American home” (NY Times).  This is the kind of narrative that regularly precedes and sets up an excuse for privatization and the sell off of public assets. . . `because he public just can’t pay for them'. .  `So the private sector has to take over to supply the funds while making a profit in doing so'. . . Blah, blah, blah.

Here is a link to the Citizens Defending Libraries page (including valuable information and further links) about the last forum we had on selling off public assets, Saturday, April 8, 2017:

Fourth Forum on Selling Off Public Assets, Presented by First Unitarian Congregational Society of Brooklyn's Weaving the Fabric of Diversity & Citizens Defending Libraries, April 8, 2017

What’s happening is very real.  This Biden infrastructure “deal” reflects continuity with what was underway in the Trump administration. Traveling with Trump to Saudi Arabia in 2016, NYPL library trustee Stephen A. Schwarzman brought back $20 billion from the Saudis for his Blackstone investment group as seed money for the selling off and privatizing of American public assets.  This is not just because Schwarzman has such good relationships with the likes of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (remember the dismemberment killing of Jamal Khashoggi- the illegal siege war and bombing of Yemen?); others like Goldman Sachs are busy raising funds for the same thing.

Thankfully, there are those who are being more forthright and honest than Democracy Now and the very deceptive New York Times.  Take this statement (‘Bipartisan’ Infrastructure Plan is a Privatization-Promoting Disaster– Wall Street takeover will cost ratepayers and must be rejected) released by Food & Water Watch Public Water for All Director Mary Grant:

“This White House-approved infrastructure deal is a disaster in the making. It promotes privatization and so-called ‘public-private partnerships’ instead of making public investments in publicly-owned infrastructure. Communities across the country have been ripped off by public-private schemes that enrich corporations and Wall Street investors and leave the rest of us to pick up the tab.

“Privatization is nothing more than an outrageously expensive way to borrow funds, with the ultimate bill paid back by households and local businesses in the form of higher rates. The White House identifies privatization as a means to finance infrastructure investment is disappointing and outrageous. Communities need real support, not privatization scams.

“The most sensible infrastructure solution is to provide robust public funding for publicly-owned projects, which would discourage price-gouging by corporate interests, protect public control over these precious assets, and save everyone money. The most comprehensive funding solution on the table is the WATER Act (HR1352, S916), which would provide $35 billion a year to fully fund the state revolving funds and other programs at the level that is needed.

“This package does not provide adequate funding to rebuild and repair our country’s infrastructure, nor does it do nearly enough to combat the climate crisis. Lawmakers can and must press for a better deal.”

“New Day Pacifica” Bylaw Proposals: A Group On The West Coast Is Declaring War on Pacifica And WBAI- Democracy and Free Speech Are In Peril

 Free Speech Peril!- A Group On The West Coast Is Declaring War on Pacifica And WBAI  . .  And On Democracy

To All Library Defenders-

Here is something that’s still in draft because we are still working on it, but it will inform you about urgent matters nonetheless.  One reason it's in draft is because the WBAI Local Station Board still needs to pass the included resolution.

If you believe in free speech and want to be able to continue to access narratives that are alternative to the propaganda the corporately owned mainstream press pumps out, we hope this will encourage you to take action, including that you and others become WBAI members (a mere $25) by April 7th.

We think you'll find the scenario reported on below familiar.  Powerful interests are working to shrink our libraries, where we get our information, and to eliminate the books; Let's not let them succeed in this parallel effort to take away free speech radio and the information and insight it provides.

Please let Carolyn and me know if you refresh or start your WBAI membership or get any of your friends to become WBAI members.

Should the Pacifica Free Speech Radio network be at war with itself? It’s a self-destructive course when it is.  But that’s exactly what seems to have happened.  The union of five free speech stations through the Pacifica network was meant to be a strengthening measure providing cross support between the stations . .

. . . But now it seems that there is a faction at the Pacifica stations on the West Coast that wants to declare war on the Pacifica stations on the East Coast and particularly New York City’s WBAI.  (WBAI is New York’s only true listener supported public radios station.) Especially considering the history of some of the actors involved in this attack, the so-called “New Day Pacifica,” proposals to strip democracy and listener accountability out of Pacifica’s bylaws, it does not seem as if that faction has the best interest of Pacifica at heart.

Do the attackers want to dismantle the Pacifica network and WBAI because they want to see free speech radio, radio for the 99.5% (WBAI is 99.5 FM on the dial in NYC) dismantled entirely?. . . .

. . . Or, do the attackers want to dismantle the Pacifica network and WBAI because they want to refashion it, do a make over so that all the stations broadcast content that falls in line with dominant, power-serving narratives pumped out by the corporate mainstream press, be it the divisive corporate “Red Broadcasting” by Fox, or the divisive corporate “Blue Broadcasting” by the likes of MSNBC.

In either case, such dismantling and destruction of Pacifica and WBAI would neutralize the threat that free speech and listener accountability pose to establishment power structures.

WBAI just aired a two-hour program to inform its listeners of the nefarious “New Day Pacifica" plans afoot.  You can find it to listen to here: “The Democracy Project,” March 6, 2021. . . (Because of the rules applicable when proposed Pacifica bylaw changes are to be voted on, WBAI is now in a period where WBAI has to be silent, neutral and unable to inform its listeners about the bylaws, but this program, predating the election period, can still be listened to on WBAI’s archive.)

Very worth listening to for understanding the overall context of obvious concerns is the stage-setting introduction for the program Johanna Fernandez, host of WBAI’s morning program, “A New Day.”  (Did “New Day Pacifica” intend to be stealing the name of Johanna’s morning show for “good will” confusion purposes?: Some people think so.)  Her introduction starts at 5:10 in the recording.

In her opening Johanna Fernandez makes a very good case that the “New Day Pacifica” proposals should be seen in an overall context of neoliberal privatizing takeover and shutdown of the free press.

Perhaps most important to listen to in that broadcast is former Pacifica board Chair Grace Aaron’s exceptionally clear technical description of the proposals that the New Day Pacifica proponents are trying to foist on the listener members of WBAI and Pacifica.  Grace Aaron names names in saying who the New Day Pacifica are and why all their actions, past and present, ensure these people and their motives are to be suspected.  (Her statement starts at 16:05 in the recording.)
 
As Grace makes clear, the proposals are designed to be an undemocratic and racially skewing dictatorial power grab by an elite minority with conflicts of interest that would shut out from representation the blacker, browner, more progressive East Coast Stations (WBAI and WPFW).  If these bylaw changes are approved they would establish locked-in leadership over Pacifica for three years by four self-appointed officers, including a Chair, Sharon Kyle, who may have a direct conflict of interest as she is the owner of the LA Progressive, an online, for-profit newspaper.  Although there would be one representative on the new board from WBAI and one from WPFW (our Washington, D.C. station). stations would be locked out of the 4 officer positions and would have fewer board members overall than the West Coast stations for 3 years.  WBAI and WPFW are Pacifica’s blacker, browner and more progressive stations.  Also, none of the 4 board officers would be from the staff or Pacifica’s affiliate stations.  The locked in structure would ensure minority opinion would have very little representation or voice.

The changes would also eliminate local control and influence over local station broadcasting by taking away the LSB oversight over station general managers.  Thus programing in New York City and Washington D.C. would be effectively determined top-down by those seizing power on the West Coast.  What could/would result?: During the October 2019 shutdown of WBAI these same people pumped into NYC programming from California that was innocuously bland, dull.  It was unthreatening to power and devoid of any sense of locality.

There is other insidious stuff tucked into the proposals like rejiggering staff representation rules to further lock in this West Coast Pacifica faction dominance.

The proposals would do absolutely nothing to improve Pacifica’s financial condition.  Instead, having to deal with proposals like these worsen it.  These now recurring launches by the same people to make different kinds of overhauling changes to the bylaws are probably intended as attempt to drain Pacifica’s preciously spare resources (including possible forcing a bankruptcy of Pacifica) and foment perpetual debilitating distraction, as much as they are actually in hope of successfully making any such changes.

How do we fend off this attack?: By April 7th,  WBAI needs to make sure that it has as many listener members ready and qualified to vote on on the upcoming bylaw referendum as possible.  That means that listeners should have contributed at least $25 or more within the year to the station.  One way to do that immediately (if someone is not currently up-to-date as a listener member) is to immediately become a member of WBAI as a BAI Buddy supporting the station or a show for $10 a month or more and then make up the extra with a one time donation (of $15 more more extra dollars?).

Another way to help win this fight is for WBAI supporters to make sure that two of their friends become WBAI members eligible to vote by April 7th.  If ever WBAI member got two friends to do that by April 7th WBAI member would more than double.  (plus it means a lot for people to be listening to WBAI and telling others about the cool and fascinating stuff they heard the there.)

And another quick stop for anyone, is to also sign (and pass along) the petition opposing the proposed bylaw changes up at The Democracy Project.

Here is the resolution that WBAI’s Local Station Board passed unanimously at its last meeting condemning the New Day Pacifica proposals:

Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Finding That Proposed “New Day Pacifica” Bylaw Changes Will Be Extremely Destructive and Adverse To The Interests of Pacifica

Whereas, whenever proposals are made to fundamentally alter the structure of the Pacifica Foundation (“Pacifica”) it is essential to examine those proposals with care to determine whether such proposed changes would truly be helpful to Pacifica or would, instead, be detrimental and destructive;        

Whereas, while it would be nice to assume that proposals to make fundamental changes to Pacifica are always made with good faith intentions to improve Pacifica, that is something that should never be assumed;

Whereas, Pacifica, as currently structured, stands ready to be a provider of truth, facts, factual corrections, and alternative narratives that pose a significant threat to the dominating narratives of the monopolistic, corporate, mainstream press that serve power structures that seek to quash and censor opposition, and, as such, we must be on guard against those entering the Pacifica environment that, whatever their pretenses, choose to be destructive and disruptive to Pacifica;

Whereas, we have to be aware that Pacifica and its terrestrial radio stations are an even more obvious target for attack by these powerful interests, because unlike the internet sources of news, information and communication, terrestrial radio cannot be as easily shut down, censored, silenced, manipulated, monitored and surveiled as is becoming increasingly evident as a problem with respect to the internet;    

Whereas, we, as WBAI’s Local Station Board (“LSB”) do not want to see Pacifica destroyed by being driven into bankruptcy or by being dismantled and reconstructed as another arm of the corporate owned and corporately captured press and media conglomerates (for instance becoming a corporate Democrat “blue broadcaster” such as some of the corporately-owned cable channels);

Whereas, our LSB believes that WBAI is one of Pacifica’s most progressive stations, successful in steering away from the traps of corporately captured and promulgated narratives and that its independence, voice, and ability to continue to be this way should be protected and preserved;

Whereas, the best way to ensure that Pacifica fends off destruction and/or neutering of its ability to be a strong, free-speech source of alternative narratives that serve the public interest and intellectual freedoms is for Pacifica and its stations to remain democratically accountable to its listeners;

Whereas, the LSB has reviewed, and is alarmed in the extreme by, the “New Day Pacifica” proposals to change the bylaws seeing that they will be detrimental and disruptive to the essential purposes of Pacifica for all of the above reasons; and

Whereas, the LSB therefore wishes to set forth its condemnation of the “New Day Pacifica” proposals for reasons that include all of what we set forth below; now, therefore be it

RESOLVED, by LSB as follows:

Section 1. The LSB condemns  the “New Day Pacifica” proposals because:

    A.   The LSB emphatically notes that many of the people behind the push for the “New Day Pacifica” proposals are the very same people who were behind and involved in: i) the surreptitious, unauthorized, illegal, and costly shutdown of WBAI of October 2019, ii) the simultaneous secretly launched and roundly defeated (by a 2/3rds margin) last set of disruptively proposed, antidemocratic bylaw changes of that time that destructively drained Pacifica of $150,000 of its resources, and iii) advocating for shutting down WBAI.

    B. The proposals are designed to be an undemocratic and racially skewing power grab by an elite minority with conflicts of interest that would shut out from representation the blacker, browner, more progressive East Coast Stations (WBAI and WPFW).  To wit, the virtually complete erosions of democracy include:
    
            •    The bylaw changes would establish locked-in rule over Pacifica for three years by four unelected, self-appointed officers, including with conflict of interest connections to for-profit media.  These individuals would have no professional radio experience.  The lock-in would include officers hostile to and connected with the shutdown of WBAI.  The individuals being picked for this lock-in of power do not include proper representation for WBAI or WPFW, the other East Coast station. None are from the staff or affiliate stations.
            •    Pacifica’s proportional voting representation ensuring a voice for minority opinion would be eliminated be reducing to one the number of representatives sent to Pacifica’s National Board from each station, thus ensuring that only the majority would have any representation or voice.
            •    To extend this elimination of elected voices the majority-representing national board members would get to appoint additional board members suitable to their more limited, undemocratic mind-set.
            •    The changes would eliminate local control and influence over local station broadcasting by taking away the LSB oversight over station general managers.  Thus programing in New York City and Washington D.C. would be effectively determined top-down by those seizing power on the West Coast.  As the example of the October 2019 shutdown of WBAI demonstrated, what these kinds of people chose to do the last time they had the opportunity to do this was to run programming that was innocuously bland, dull and unthreatening to power and devoid of any sense of locality.
            •    The changes would rejigger the staff representation rules in order to assure that the results of staff elections would always give the West Coast Pacifica stations assured dominance.

    C. The proposals are additionally very suspect because they would do absolutely nothing to improve Pacifica’s financial condition, but presenting and having to deal with proposals like these absolutely worsen it.  The recurring launches by the same people to make different kinds of overhauling changes to the bylaws are probably intended as attempt to drain Pacifica’s preciously spare resources (including possible forcing a bankruptcy of Pacifica) and foment perpetual debilitating distraction, as much as they are actually in hope of successfully making any such changes.

    D. The proposals would make the Pacific bylaws far longer than they are now and far more complicated, a highly undesirable outcome.

Section 2.  To defend against and repel this onslaught against listener interest, the LSB encourages WBAI listeners to increase their contributions to WBAI and Pacifica, and if they are not currently, to become current members of WBAI and Pacifica, particularly on or before April 7, 2021 (with a contribution of $25 or more), and to encourage everyone they know to do the same.
           
Section 3.  This resolution shall take effect immediately and the LSB directs the LSB chair to forward this resolution to the Pacific National Board and make every effort to promulgate it widely for public view and to ensure it becomes widely known that the LSB denounces the “New Day Pacifica” proposals by reason of all the harm the proposal of those bylaw changes are apparently designed to inflict on Pacifica in its pursuit of its mission and particularly on WBAI.

If you want to know more history about when a lot of the same ““New Day Pacifica” people were involved in the surreptitious, unauthorized, illegal and costly October 2019 sut down of WBAI, you can find it here along with the resolution that the WBAI LSB unanimously adopted to condemn it then:

Resolution of WBAI’s Local Station Board Responding To Shutdown of WBAI New York

Once again- Fend off this attack as follows:

            •    By April 7th,  help make sure WBAI has as many listener members ready and qualified to vote on on the upcoming bylaw referendum as possible.  That means that listeners should have contributed at least $25 or more within the year to the station.


            •    Make sure your friends (at least two?) become WBAI members eligible to vote by April 7th.

            •    Sign (and pass along) the petition opposing the proposed bylaw changes up at The Democracy Project.